I wonder about the ratio where the 'angry internet mob' describes a factual provable situation vs. when it's misused as a scapegoat, in order to avoid dealing with unwanted valid arguments or other peoples' opinions.
To the left is the ideal of your game. On the right side is the profit maximisation. The compromises are often in between (unless you're lucky, don't care about money or go fully after it).
You could 'hack' your own game and publish it under a pseudonym as a testament of the angry internet mob, or release it as homebrew including some wicked v0.3 data.
To the left is the ideal of your game. On the right side is the profit maximisation. The compromises are often in between (unless you're lucky, don't care about money or go fully after it).
You could 'hack' your own game and publish it under a pseudonym as a testament of the angry internet mob, or release it as homebrew including some wicked v0.3 data.